Against The Wisdom of Fools

I read with dismay Glen Beck’s article entitled, “Liberation Theology and Social Justice.”  Upon reading it, my vision of holistic reparations was clarified.  And, Glenn Beck is certainly in need of reparations! 

In his article, Mr. Beck railed against Liberation Theology and the concept of social justice.  It is irresponsible for him to give the impression that his is an educated opinion that has been well-thought and is sound in formation.  And with millions of listeners following his program, his inflammatory remarks are nothing short of reckless.

Worse is his misconception of Liberation Theology and tragic is his inability to reconcile social justice with the Gospel of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.  Worse still is his misappropriation of theology.  Think of the spiritual damage done to his listeners.  And, while he stands before his chalkboard presuming to instruct the masses, I am reminded of what St. James said: “Not many of you should presume to be teachers, my brothers, because you know that we who teach will be judged more strictly (3:1).”

Herein lies my hope that Glenn Beck “gets his reparations!”  For as I have said and believe, “Reparations is an expression of Christian love.”  Reparations might consist of some sort of recompense.  Yet, that is not important.  Rather, our plea for Reparations is one of compassion; one of love for mankind. For our God does not delight in the death of the sinner but that he should repent and live.

The sin here is that Glenn Beck presumes to be a teacher, and has failed to educate himself on the matters of which he speaks.  One may take issue with Liberation Theology, yes.  One may take issue with Dr. James H. Cone.  And although I understand the climate in which it was birthed, I myself, have some disagreements with Black Theology.

Glenn Beck and his article “Liberation Theology and Social Justice” presents a perfect opportunity to explain my disagreement with Dr. Cone and Black Theology.  I do not believe there should be a Black Theology.  Christ prayed that we (humanity) would be one as He and His Father are One.  That entails a symbiotic relationship (a perichoresis) in which all persons within humanity are interdependent.  To that end, there should be ONE Christian Theology.  A so-called “Black Theology” allows the fallacy of Western (European/White) Theology to pass for authentic Christian Theology when the theologies of the Western (“civilized”) World has been complicit and/or encouraging in the ecological and anthropological crises of the world.

I am tired of seeing the Gospel trampled underfoot and the Lord being used to serve the selfish and inhumane ways of man.  Mr. Beck’s article is theologically inaccurate at best and intentionally disingenuous at worse.

Mr. Beck asks, “how does a white person get salvation in that system” and takes issue with Dr. Cone suggesting that in order to be Christian (to be saved) one must be willing to give up their wealth and privilege.  Certainly Glenn Beck also disagrees with Christ.  When asked by the Rich Young Ruler in Luke 18:18-23 what one must do to be saved, our Lord told him that he must keep all of the commandments.  In other words, Christ instructed him to obey the (societal) law.  Yet, this man felt justified in his conduct and confident that he was thus “saved.”  Ultimately our Lord told him: “There is still one thing you haven’t done.  Sell all your possessions and give the money to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven.  Then come, follow me. (vs. 22)”

Isn’t it ironic?  While White people were “masters” they sold the people they had enslaved a theology of obedience to masters, enduring injustice now for the “great reward” in heaven.  Yet, I am sure many will attempt some form of intellectual gymnastics to circumvent the command given by our Lord in Luke 18:22.

Glenn Beck’s primary argument against this is that the concept is devoid of “merit.”  He then attempts to juxtapose the concept of merit with that of grace.  However, the Christian concept of grace is in direct conflict with that of merit. 

Merit is defined as: “something that deserves or justifies a reward or commendation.”  Yet, in Matthew 10:8 our Lord exemplifies His grace when He says: “Heal the sick, raise the dead, cleanse those who have leprosy, drive out demons. Freely you have received, freely give.”  St. Paul goes further in Romans 5:8 and says, “But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.”

Merit indicates something earned or deserved.  The Christian concept of grace indicates something unearned and not deserved.  The grace we have received from Christ should not harden our hearts to the sufferings and injustices of humanity.  Rather, the grace given to us sinners through our Lords compassion should compel us to freely share our grace with others...giving them what they have not earned and do not deserve.  Certainly, we should be compelled to give what they have earned and do deserve!

The fallacies continue with Mr. Beck’s views on salvation.  And I must include Dr. Richard Land since Glenn Beck says he consulted him on this position.  (I can only hope Glenn Beck took Dr. Land's comment out of context.)  Mr. Beck says that, “salvation is an individual relationship between a person and God through Jesus' sacrifice on the cross...I can't be saved for someone else and they can't be saved by me.”

Wow!  I wonder if we think of the theological implications of the stuff we pass off as authentic Christian witness?!  What would that statement mean, if it were true?

Well first, if it is true that others cannot “be saved by me” as Beck suggests then that completely negates the “White Man’s Burden,” and flies in the face of Western Christian (premillennial) thought that has justified Western society’s quest to subdue the earth and resulted in the enslavement of Africans, colonization of people across the world and displacement of indigenous people.  The excuse had been that Europeans were doing a service to the “backwards people of the world” by oppressing them and bringing them to Christianity so they can be saved.

Second, if we are not saved for others as Glenn Beck suggests, then how does our Lord’s individual sacrifice have any collective efficacy, even for the collective of individuals?  We have been commissioned to continue His work on earth.  And if His work on the Cross was for others, should not our labors be for others as well?  Again St. Paul said it well, “Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools.”  This is not Black Theology...it is not White Theology.  This is Christian Theology, and something to which all who proclaim their allegiance to the Cross must submit. 

May we not follow those who are foolish, that we might not die for want of wisdom!  And, may the foolish amend their ways and conform to the image and likeness of Christ!

The Reasons for the Recent Oil Spill

People are searching high and low for the reasons behind the oil spill in the Gulf.  There are investigations, questions, defenses, etc.  Yet, the answer was given long before the spill ever happened.  In 1985, Jürgen Moltmann wrote God in Creation.  In it, he dealt with what he called the "Ecological Crisis."  The insights he offers has much to say regarding the cause of the recent oil spill and other ecological disasters.

The ecological crisis of the modern world has its starting point in the modern industrial countries.  These grew up in the midst of civilizations which had been shaped by Christianity...

The crisis of the modern world is not due merely to the technologies for the exploitation of nature; nor can we put it down to the sciences which made human beings the lords of nature.  It is based much more profoundly on the striving of human beings for power and domination...Unbridled striving for power was to make human beings like their God, 'the Almighty'; so these human beings invoked God's almighty power in order to furnish a religious justification for their own.  The Christian belief in creation as it has been maintained in the European and American Christianity of the Western churches is therefore not guiltless of the crisis in the world today.

 In other words, Moltmann asserts that the Western church's acquiescence to industrialization and "progress" as opposed to obeying God has caused this inconvenient truth.  So, did the Western Church - by its apathy - cause the oil spill?  Has the Western Church, through neglect, caused global warming?  Is the Western Church responsible for the crisis that has led to the "ecological crisis?"

Everyone is trying to pin the blame on someone else.  Democrats place it on Republicans.  Republicans place it on Democrats.  BP and Big Oil place blame on the Government.  The Government places the blame on Big Oil.  The people do not know who to blame.  The reality is that no one is blaming themselves, and everyone should...for all of us has bought into the theology that the earth is ours to rape and pillage.  It is no longer God's, on loan to us.  God has been robbed of His creation and we abuse it, looking over our shoulders hoping He does not return.

The answer to this crisis lies in our return to God.  No stricter environmental regulations will save the earth.  Rethinking offshore drilling is not what's most important.  The most important thing is that we correct our relationship to God.  For, if that relationship is right then we will be able to see God in creation, and respect the earth and environment as His creation.

 

The Marriage Debate Resolved

I start thus: I am an Orthodox Christian who believes that marriage is a religious sacrament ordained by God, as a bond between a man and a woman.  But, to those who support gay rights, don't be turned off yet.  And, to those who are against this initiative, don't rest easy.  I will not say what you think. 

In Christianity the bond of marriage is between one man and one woman.  For other faiths, there may be an allowance for multiple wives.  Yet, that bond is still between male and female.

So, where does an Orthodox (and thus, conservative) Christian fall in this debate?  On the side of religion of course.  But, what does that mean?

Many are up in arms about Proposition 8 in California.  This ballot item was dubbed as an effort to "protect marriage."  The so-called "defense of marriage has been a heated debate.  Here's a clip of the protests:

There is no reason for this argument.  Marriage is a Sacrament of Religion...not of the State.  If we truly want to "protect" marriage we would keep it out of the State and leave it in religion where it belongs.  It is not homosexuality that is destroying marriage.  It is the State, and the fact that we have abdicated that right to the State, that destroys marriage. 

What is the solution?  Abolish all marriage in the eyes of the State.  Change everything to Civil Unions.  There is the equality: heterosexuals would have Civil Unions and homosexuals would have Civil Unions.  Transgenders would be entitled to Civil Unions. 

Then leave marriage to the respective faiths.  Let the individual religious sects and/or denominations decide who will and will not be granted a marriage.  This way, everyone can enjoy Liberty - which is the promise of America, without violating any religious doctrine.

We do not need to be divided by this issue - regardless of our religious (or a religious) beliefs.  We must allow people to respect religion, but we must also allow people to have no religion.  If we disagree with their stance, we should pray for their hearts to be changed - not force them.  But, that's my opinion...what's yours?

I'm keeping my eyes open. May the Lord keep the city, that my watching be not in vain.

Proposition 8